================
@@ -722,6 +722,58 @@ TEST(DWARFExpression, DW_OP_plus_uconst) {
EXPECT_THAT_EXPECTED(Evaluate({DW_OP_const1s, static_cast<uint8_t>(-10),
DW_OP_plus_uconst, 5}),
ExpectScalar(static_cast<int32_t>(-5)));
+ const char *yamldata = R"(
+--- !ELF
+FileHeader:
+ Class: ELFCLASS64
+ Data: ELFDATA2LSB
+ Type: ET_EXEC
+ Machine: EM_386
+DWARF:
+ debug_abbrev:
+ - Table:
+ - Code: 0x00000001
+ Tag: DW_TAG_compile_unit
+ Children: DW_CHILDREN_yes
+ Attributes:
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_language
+ Form: DW_FORM_data2
+ - Code: 0x00000002
+ Tag: DW_TAG_base_type
+ Children: DW_CHILDREN_no
+ Attributes:
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_encoding
+ Form: DW_FORM_data1
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_byte_size
+ Form: DW_FORM_data1
+ debug_info:
+ - Version: 4
----------------
firmiana402 wrote:
Since this test uses `DW_OP_convert` and is specifically checking
typed-expression semantics, should this fixture be a DWARF v5 unit (with the
corresponding `UnitType` and updated DIE offset)? `DW_OP_convert` is a DWARF v5
opcode, so the current v4 fixture is not a valid typed-expression input.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/204896
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
