Nerixyz wrote: > Note, we might both be violating this rule if RTTI was on and would have > allowed us to figure out a dynamic type for a class with no vtable, but > currently lldb is ignorant of RTTI (as am I TTTT, I've never worked on a > project that enabled that C++ feature...)
Afaik, even with RTTI, the type still needs a vtable to be determined at runtime. On the MS ABI, the RTTI info is referenced above the first vtable entry. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/155853 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
