labath added a comment. In D62302#1513824 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62302#1513824>, @probinson wrote:
> Drive-by: For the "dead code" did you check whether gcc emits > DW_AT_start_scope? LLDB should support more than just what Clang emits. I agree with that, but the fact that clang does not emit the attribute was not the reason why I called the code dead. It was the reason why I did not bother implementing it here. :) The code is dead because it parses the ranges in the DW_AT_start_scope attribute, and then it just throws them away. What's missing is the part which converts this into the debug-format-agnostic form that the rest of lldb can use. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62302/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62302 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
