kwk marked an inline comment as done. kwk added a comment. @JDevlieghere I change the support tool. It was @labath who requested (D66791#inline-601050 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66791#inline-601050>) to outsource this patch. In that change you can find the whole reason which is somewhat more longish:
> Let's put this bit into a separate patch. As I said over IRC, I view this bit > as functionally independent of the debugdata stuff (it's definitely > independent in it's current form, as it will kick in for non-debugdata files > too, which I think is fine). But apart from that I think the comment indeed needs to change. Anyway, please let me know if the connection to the other change D66791 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66791> does make sense to you. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67390/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67390 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits