kwk marked an inline comment as done.
kwk added a comment.

@JDevlieghere I change the support tool. It was @labath who requested 
(D66791#inline-601050 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66791#inline-601050>) to 
outsource this patch. In that change you can find the whole reason which is 
somewhat more longish:

> Let's put this bit into a separate patch. As I said over IRC, I view this bit 
> as functionally independent of the debugdata stuff (it's definitely 
> independent in it's current form, as it will kick in for non-debugdata files 
> too, which I think is fine).

But apart from that I think the comment indeed needs to change. Anyway, please 
let me know if the connection to the other change D66791 
<https://reviews.llvm.org/D66791> does make sense to you.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D67390/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D67390



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to