teemperor accepted this revision.
teemperor added a comment.

I think the refactoring is a good idea, but IMHO this patch can go in as-is. 
It's not adding any more debt to the existing approach (it even deletes code) 
and it adds tests, so I don't see a drawback of merging this. Also having this 
bug fixed with a small back portable patch seems better than doing it with some 
big refactor.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D80254/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D80254



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to