jingham accepted this revision.
jingham added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

I can't see anything wrong with this, it seems to follow the practice of other 
parts of GetSharedModule.  I'm still not quite certain why I've never seen an 
instance where the absence of your fix has caused problems, and it isn't clear 
from the patch why that is.  If there something special about handling breakpad 
files that moves you out of the normal code path for replacing overridden 
modules?  So I still have a lurking feeling I'm missing something?

OTOH, seems like any time you find that one module is a newer version of one 
you held onto you should mention it, so this seems okay.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D89157/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D89157

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to