teemperor added a comment. In D91003#2381885 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91003#2381885>, @mgorny wrote:
> In D91003#2381881 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91003#2381881>, @labath wrote: > >> If we put all of the objc tests into objc-specific directories (it looks >> like most of them are there already, but I spotted two outliers in this >> patch), then we could mark those directories with the existing "objc" >> category, and use the existing category-based skipping mechanism. I don't >> remember seeing the code for setting the objc category, so I don't know how >> it works, but it shouldn't be hard to make it skip this category on >> platforms which don't (currently) support objc. > > Actually, I've started working on this but I don't know how to reliably > detect all Darwin platforms, with all the weird simulator environments and so > on, from lit. Could you just do this via a feature check? For libc++ we try compiling a dummy file (grep for `checkLibcxxSupport`) and we could do the same with a very simple Obj-C program including `NSObject.h`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D91003/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D91003 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
