Russell, to elaborate on Greg’s point, LLDB for Linux is an evolving creature and isn’t yet at the point where we can cut a release and call it “stable.” You’re going to have a much better experience by using as recent an SVN checkout as possible.
Sean On Mar 7, 2013, at 1:24 PM, "Russell E. Owen" <[email protected]> wrote: > We have a linux system that uses LLVM 3.2 and Clang 3.2. I would really > like to have LLDB available, as well. > > However, I have not found an official repo of LLDB 3.2, even though the > release notes for LLVM 3.2 > <http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/docs/ReleaseNotes.html> do mention it. > > svn ls http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lldb/tags > shows lots of LLDB tags, but none that are labelled 3.2. Is one of them > the right choice, and does it work well on linux? > > Any suggestions on how best to proceed? Given a choice we prefer stable > releases, but robustness is even more important. > > -- Russell > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
