Just to be sure: You don't have to build programs with the same revision clang to debug them in lldb, but you must checkout the same revision of the three projects to build lldb.
Regards, Filipe Cabecinhas On Thursday, 7 de March de 2013 at 14:14, Sean Callanan wrote: > Russell, > > lldb can (and ought to) use debug information from any clang released before > it. You do not need to synchronize. > > Sean > > On Mar 7, 2013, at 2:13 PM, "Russell E. Owen" <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > In article <[email protected] > > (mailto:[email protected])>, > > Sean Callanan <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > > > Russell, > > > > > > to elaborate on Greg's point, LLDB for Linux is an evolving creature and > > > isn't yet at the point where we can cut a release and call it "stable." > > > You're > > > going to have a much better experience by using as recent an SVN checkout > > > as possible. > > > > > > Sean > > > > Thank you all for your helpful and quick replies. > > > > One more question, please: If I build LLDB trunk against Clang and LLVM > > trunk, must I also use that trunk of Clang and LLVM for compiling my > > code? Or may I continue to use the 3.2 releases of Clang and LLVM (and > > does it make sense to do so)? > > > > -- Russell > > > > P.S. I love LLDB with Clang and LLVM on my Mac. That is why I'm so keen > > to have it on linux. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lldb-dev mailing list > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
