On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 7:37 PM, Greg Clayton wrote:
Looks safe to me and it is nice to clear up warnings when we can.

Thanks!  Committed in r184333, 184334 and 184335.

On Jun 19, 2013, at 7:30 AM, Andy Gibbs wrote:

Hi,

Does anyone have any objections to me committing this patch?

Thanks
Andy


On Friday, June 14, 2013 5:14 PM, Andy Gibbs wrote:
Hi,

Following on from the recent discussion on build warnings at
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/lldb-dev/2013-June/001854.html et al.,
attached is a patch that sorts out a good number of those warnings.

However... I don't have a working lldb build in any case -- this is what I
am working towards -- so I am not able to check whether this patch
introduces any regressions. I hope and believe not, but could someone else
verify for me before I commit it?  Mostly the patch is sorting out
mismatched integer types. I've been very conservative, so there are still quite a few more warnings still being emitted, but it may still have cleared
enough of the wood away to see the remaining trees :o)

Thanks

Andy

<lldb (1).diff>_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev


_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Reply via email to