On 11 December 2013 11:41, Ed Maste <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 December 2013 11:25, Sylvestre Ledru <[email protected]> wrote: >> To rephrase my question, do you know which commit(s) broke lldb under >> GNU/Linux ? >> r196786 seems unrelated to me. > > I believe Xavier means 196786 is fine and 196787 fails. I'm looking at it.
I reverted the Linux changes in r196787 yesterday and was unable to reproduce the issue in a Debian VM. The revert is r197065. Xavier can you confirm this fixes your issue? The revert moves three Linux-specific functions back into Plugins/Process/POSIX: POSIXThread::Resume ProcessPOSIX::DoResume ProcessPOSIX::SendMessage _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
