r197065 does fix this issue on archlinux, thanks.

Xavier

On 12/12/2013 03:01 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 11 December 2013 11:41, Ed Maste wrote:
>> On 11 December 2013 11:25, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>>> To rephrase my question, do you know which commit(s) broke lldb under
>>> GNU/Linux ?
>>> r196786 seems unrelated to me.
>>
>> I believe Xavier means 196786 is fine and 196787 fails.  I'm looking at it.
>
> I reverted the Linux changes in r196787 yesterday and was unable to
> reproduce the issue in a Debian VM.  The revert is r197065.  Xavier
> can you confirm this fixes your issue?
>
> The revert moves three Linux-specific functions back into 
Plugins/Process/POSIX:
>
> POSIXThread::Resume
> ProcessPOSIX::DoResume
> ProcessPOSIX::SendMessage
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Reply via email to