I must be missing something... Can't you just suspend all the other threads, and then continue?
Jim > On Sep 4, 2014, at 12:54 AM, Mario Zechner <badlogicga...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > i'm currently working on a debugger based on the public LLDB API and am > currently looking into multi-threaded debugging. The debugger should support > the following scenario: > > - user sets breakpoints > - two or more threads get stopped due to breakpoints > - user wants to continue execution of only one of the threads > > SBThread has the methods Suspend/Resume. To my understanding (and tests), > Suspend marks a thread as not to be continued when the entire process is > continued. Which is the oposite of what i'd need for my use case. > > I looked into the implementation of the command 'thread continue', but that > uses the private LLDB API, which is sadly not an option for us at this point. > > I'd be greatful for any hints. > > Thanks, > Mario > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
