Totally missed that option, thanks for pointing it out! Mario On Sep 4, 2014 8:14 PM, <jing...@apple.com> wrote:
> I must be missing something... Can't you just suspend all the other > threads, and then continue? > > Jim > > > On Sep 4, 2014, at 12:54 AM, Mario Zechner <badlogicga...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > i'm currently working on a debugger based on the public LLDB API and am > currently looking into multi-threaded debugging. The debugger should > support the following scenario: > > > > - user sets breakpoints > > - two or more threads get stopped due to breakpoints > > - user wants to continue execution of only one of the threads > > > > SBThread has the methods Suspend/Resume. To my understanding (and > tests), Suspend marks a thread as not to be continued when the entire > process is continued. Which is the oposite of what i'd need for my use case. > > > > I looked into the implementation of the command 'thread continue', but > that uses the private LLDB API, which is sadly not an option for us at this > point. > > > > I'd be greatful for any hints. > > > > Thanks, > > Mario > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lldb-dev mailing list > > lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
