On 21 January 2015 at 16:57, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > > Is there any way to work around this restriction? It seems like it > shouldn't matter what the bounds of the function are, or if there's even a > function at this address at all. As long as there's code.
You should be able to use a combination of -s start address / -e end address / -c instruction count. Perhaps we could disassemble a small number of instructions starting from the provided address if -a is given an address outside of a function. _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
