We should definitely get test coverage in place along with a fix to ensure that we’re not surprised by future regressions.
Kate Stone k8st...@apple.com <mailto:k8st...@apple.com> Xcode Runtime Analysis Tools > On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Jason Molenda <jmole...@apple.com> wrote: > > This could be r179258 from April 2013 that broke it. > >> On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:04 PM, jing...@apple.com wrote: >> >> Yeah, my guess is the change to make "dis" mean disassemble the current >> function did it, and that was a while ago. Initially, dis didn't mean >> anything except as the repeat command. >> >> Jim >> >>> On Jan 21, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Ed Maste <ema...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 21 January 2015 at 17:35, <jing...@apple.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> "source list" does the same trick disassemble was SUPPOSED to do. >>>> >>>> But with TOT lldb, something seems to have broken that: >>> >>> It looks like it's been broken for quite some time: We have an LLDB >>> snapshot in the FreeBSD base system, and the version on my desktop is >>> from around r202189. It shows the same behaviour. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-dev mailing list >> lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
