Le 01/06/2015 09:55, Andrew Wilkins a écrit :
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 at 11:06 Vince Harron <vi...@nethacker.com
> <mailto:vi...@nethacker.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Andrew,
>
>     We're not testing that configuration so I'm not surprised that
>     you're hitting problems.  I'd like to look into it but we're
>     working towards a release now and this isn't the most critical
>     issue.  For today, I recommend building without this flag.
>
>
> No worries. When would be a good time to ping back? I was hoping to
> get the packaging updated for 3.7, but that may be too aggressive, and
> not leave enough time for bug fixing.
>
> Also, in case I wasn't clear: I have changes ready, I just thought it
> might be polite to bring it up here first, since I've not contributed
> before. Building without the flag isn't really an option for Debian
> packaging. The autotools-based build already links LLDB libs against
> libLLVM.so, and it would be best to preserve that.
>
Yep, I confirm that it is needed to move the Debian & Ubuntu packages
from autotools to cmake.
For now, I have an important number of undefined symbols.
Could you send your patch? I would be happy to test that.

Thanks,
Sylvestre

_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Reply via email to