Le 01/06/2015 09:55, Andrew Wilkins a écrit : > On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 at 11:06 Vince Harron <vi...@nethacker.com > <mailto:vi...@nethacker.com>> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > We're not testing that configuration so I'm not surprised that > you're hitting problems. I'd like to look into it but we're > working towards a release now and this isn't the most critical > issue. For today, I recommend building without this flag. > > > No worries. When would be a good time to ping back? I was hoping to > get the packaging updated for 3.7, but that may be too aggressive, and > not leave enough time for bug fixing. > > Also, in case I wasn't clear: I have changes ready, I just thought it > might be polite to bring it up here first, since I've not contributed > before. Building without the flag isn't really an option for Debian > packaging. The autotools-based build already links LLDB libs against > libLLVM.so, and it would be best to preserve that. > Yep, I confirm that it is needed to move the Debian & Ubuntu packages from autotools to cmake. For now, I have an important number of undefined symbols. Could you send your patch? I would be happy to test that.
Thanks, Sylvestre
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
