On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 at 22:03 Vince Harron <vi...@nethacker.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew, > > Thanks for the patch and thanks for your patience. The release is in 4-6 > weeks but there are a lot of people on the team, someone will probably have > a chance to look sooner. > > Is there a deadline you are working against? > No particular deadline. My ultimate goal is to get llgo (Go frontend for LLVM) packaged in Debian and Ubuntu. llgo only has CMake, and I don't want to maintain both CMake and autotools. Packaging is meant to be moving to CMake anyway, so I'm seeing what I can do to help move that forward. I'd like to have the LLVM changes done by the 3.7 release if possible. Cheers, Andrew > Vince > On Jun 1, 2015 1:16 AM, "Andrew Wilkins" <axw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 at 16:01 Sylvestre Ledru <sylves...@debian.org> wrote: >> >>> Le 01/06/2015 09:55, Andrew Wilkins a écrit : >>> >>> On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 at 11:06 Vince Harron < <vi...@nethacker.com> >>> vi...@nethacker.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Andrew, >>>> >>>> We're not testing that configuration so I'm not surprised that you're >>>> hitting problems. I'd like to look into it but we're working towards a >>>> release now and this isn't the most critical issue. For today, I recommend >>>> building without this flag. >>>> >>> >>> No worries. When would be a good time to ping back? I was hoping to >>> get the packaging updated for 3.7, but that may be too aggressive, and not >>> leave enough time for bug fixing. >>> >>> Also, in case I wasn't clear: I have changes ready, I just thought it >>> might be polite to bring it up here first, since I've not contributed >>> before. Building without the flag isn't really an option for Debian >>> packaging. The autotools-based build already links LLDB libs against >>> libLLVM.so, and it would be best to preserve that. >>> >>> Yep, I confirm that it is needed to move the Debian & Ubuntu packages >>> from autotools to cmake. >>> For now, I have an important number of undefined symbols. >>> Could you send your patch? I would be happy to test that. >>> >> >> Sure, I've just uploaded it to Phabricator: >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D10157. >> >> Vince, please feel free to ignore that one for now, as you're busy. I >> don't want to disrupt anyone's work. >> >> Cheers, >> Andrew >> >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
