On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote:
> I think we should get some data before pulling numbers out of our sleeves.
> If we can get some numbers on the slowest machine that we have around, then
> we should be able to specify the timeout as some multiple of the slowest
> test. For example, for me the slowest test takes around 110 seconds. The
> timeout is 4 minutes (~ 2x) and I don't get tests timing out. How long does
> the slowest test take for you? If we set the timeout as 3x or 4x that
> number, we should create a sufficiently large buffer and still avoid
> half-hour waits.

The longest test takes over 300 seconds. This is a late 2013 Mac Pro,
so, definitely not the newest machine out there (but also something
fairly high spec).
For the archives, my conf is something like; cmake -GNinja ../llvm &&
ninja check-lldb


lldb-dev mailing list

Reply via email to