On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Jim Ingham <jing...@apple.com> wrote:
> It sounds like we timing out based on the whole test class, not the
> individual tests? If you're worried about test failures not hanging up the
> test suite the you really want to do the latter.
> These are all tests that contain 5 or more independent tests. That's
> probably why they are taking so long to run.
> I don't object to having fairly long backstop timeouts, though I agree with
> Pavel that we should choose something reasonable based on the slowest running
> tests just so some single error doesn't cause test runs to just never
> complete, making analysis harder.
Vedant (cc:ed) is going to take a look at this as he's babysitting the
bots for the week. I'll defer the call to him.
lldb-dev mailing list