I took appinfo from the schema for schemas. The <annotation> stuff was lifted from w3c. I don't know what appinfo is, either. It was just there.
-gww -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of John R. Hogerhuis Sent: Fri 9/7/2007 3:37 PM To: LLRP Toolkit Development List Cc: Subject: Re: [ltk-d] documentation in llrpdef.xml [heur] On 9/7/07, Paul Dietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK. I'll make it optional. > > If I make the changes to the schema and update the llrpdef.xml am I > going to break any libraries? It'll take me a few days to update the > code anyway, but wanted to understand if there are compatibility issues > we need to work around. > > Paul > I doubt any LTK based apps are schema aware. Everyone just processes the llrpdef.xml directly not caring about the schema. Certainly LTK-Perl, LTK-C and LTK-CPP are not, so from that perspective it is a safe change. Java, Rifidi? The main test to do is just use xmlstarlet or your text editor to validate llrpdef.xml against the final xsd. If it passes, we should be fine. -- John. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel
