================
@@ -5039,10 +5039,25 @@ calculateRegisterUsage(VPlan &Plan,
ArrayRef<ElementCount> VFs,
// even in the scalar case.
RegUsage[ClassID] += 1;
} else {
+ // The output from scaled phis and scaled reductions actually have
+ // fewer lanes than the VF.
+ ElementCount VF = VFs[J];
+ if (auto *ReductionR = dyn_cast<VPReductionPHIRecipe>(R))
+ VF = VF.divideCoefficientBy(ReductionR->getVFScaleFactor());
+ else if (auto *PartialReductionR =
+ dyn_cast<VPPartialReductionRecipe>(R))
+ VF =
VF.divideCoefficientBy(PartialReductionR->getVFScaleFactor());
+
+ LLVM_DEBUG(if (VF != VFs[J]) {
+ dbgs() << "LV(REG): Scaled down VF from " << VFs[J] << " to "
+ << VF << " for ";
+ R->dump();
----------------
sdesmalen-arm wrote:
minor nit: Is it worth creating a `operator<<` for VPDef, so that you can write:
```suggestion
<< VF << " for " << *R << "\n";
```
?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133090
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
