https://github.com/jmorse commented:
Are there any expected interactions between atom-group-numbers and loading bitcode? i.e., if we serialise the literal atom-group-number to the output and then read it back in again, then it might conflict with atom-group-numbers seen in other functions in other bitcode files. It doesn't appear that they get re-numbered in the textual IR parsing patch for example. Possibly part of the design here is to simply not care, if it's only about internal consistency within a Function (does that hold after inlining too). Apologies if this is all explained in a later patch. The answers to that should ultimately be documented somewhere; I imagine that's in the patch stack or coming later. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133478 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
