MacDue wrote: > If you express the size of the hazard padding between the PPRs and ZPRs as a > scalable size, that might simplify some of the logic? You wouldn't need to > represent the two areas as separate stacks, at least.
It would, but for the sizes of hazard padding and vscale we're interested in, it would result in a much larger allocation than necessary and likely complicate addressing predicates and vectors more so (due to limited ranges for scalable offsets). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142392 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
