erichkeane wrote: > I don't think this really meets our requirements for a backport? It isn't > really fixing a regression/etc, right? This is just a general bug-fix? Or am > I missing something?
Ah, I see on the original that @ChuanqiXu9 said we need to do so? I'd like to see the reasoning. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154077 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
