yronglin wrote: > > I don't think this really meets our requirements for a backport? It isn't > > really fixing a regression/etc, right? This is just a general bug-fix? Or > > am I missing something? > > Ah, I see on the original that @ChuanqiXu9 said we need to do so? I'd like to > see the reasoning.
Yes, @boris-kolpackov also report an issue: "BTW, the linked https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/151985 show that this issue precludes Clang from compiling its own -frewrite-includes output". https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154077 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
