================
@@ -923,6 +932,11 @@ namespace {
if (PointerAuthQualifier Q = F->getType().getPointerAuth();
Q && Q.isAddressDiscriminated())
return false;
+ // Non-trivially-copyable fields with pointer field protection need to be
+ // copied one by one.
+ if (!CGF.getContext().arePFPFieldsTriviallyCopyable(ClassDecl) &&
----------------
ojhunt wrote:
Maybe we should just have a ASTContext::isFieldAddressDependent(FieldDecl*)? it
can wrap hasAddressDiscriminatedPointerAuth() (or whatever I named it) and the
PFP check? Wouldn't depend on sharing data between the two, it can just do both
checks sequentially, as I just realized while typing this comment that I'd been
brainfarting may way through with PFP being decl based not type :D
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/172119
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
