mtrofin wrote: > The more I think about it, the more I think it makes sense to just run GUID > assignment. It's a no-op if we have existing GUID metadata. Maybe at some > point we enforce GUID presence, but I think we're a ways off from that, so in > the mean time we should just ensure we can handle arbitrary legal IR in > llvm-reduce.
Do we know why it might not have GUID metadata? Is it a reducer artifact? I.e. should the reducer know not the remove GUID if present? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208965 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
