boomanaiden154 wrote: > Do we know why it might not have GUID metadata? Is it a reducer artifact? > I.e. should the reducer know not the remove GUID if present?
I ran into this error with ThinLTO BC straight out of clang in a distributed ThinLTO setup. I'm still not sure why GUIDs were not fully present, but they were missing from somewhere. > Why would it? I don't even know what this is. It's not the default It should be the default after some recent changes. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208965 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
