http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10606
Sean Hunt <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Sean Hunt <[email protected]> 2011-08-08 07:07:09 CDT --- Clang's behavior is correct. Lexically, 'and' is not an identifier but an operator, and one cannot define a macro for an operator. -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
