http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10606
Paul Eremeeff <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #2 from Paul Eremeeff <[email protected]> 2011-08-08 07:15:53 CDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Clang's behavior is correct. Lexically, 'and' is not an identifier but an > operator, and one cannot define a macro for an operator. This sample is based on code found in Boost library. This code compiles with other compilers (VisualC++ for instance). I think there must be some compatibility in Clang with such specific issues? -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
