For now toby I will keep lspv2 based around the original lsp. I also think
once i get the login stuff sorted we coudl replace the current main login
on the site with the django based one and at least get people registered
there in the new database. what is your opinion toby

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Tobias Doerffel
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> the long-term plan is to change to ZIP files containing a base XML
> file which defines the structure of a project (tracks, patterns, notes
> etc.) and links to resources (the settings of each track represent an
> internal preset resource) in the ZIP file (presets, samples, sub
> projects (which could be used/rendered by a new type of track)). So
> basically for project files I'd like to follow the principle of
> separation of structure and (audio) presentation.
>
> You can keep that in mind when designing LSPv2 but don't rely on it
> for now. Should be easy to implement an extractor module later which
> provides e.g. search and download functionality for the content of a
> project file.
>
> Best regards
>
> Toby
>



-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to