On 01/18/2014 01:44 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Hi Paul, > > just had the time to read your docs regarding Unison design and I > really like it. As an abstract description it's very similiar to how > LMMS is supposed to work in the future (especially the resources > section). I don't know whether to agree or disagree about the > migration to LV2 as I don't see an immediate advantage over the > existing approach + we have to deal with dependencies on LMMS > components (as you've mentioned already as well). I'd rather > cleanup/simplify the existing API (especially regarding FX plugins).
Can't we have LV2 support on top of the existing plugin architecture, similar to Vestige? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
