On 01/27/2014 09:24 PM, David Gerard wrote: > Yes, it may create a copyright violation - but it still doesn't > implicitly constitute a release under the licence. - d.
Why not? What are you basing this opinion on? Arguably, if one writes code for a GPL-licensed software, then send that code to a remote repository, that counts as distribution or propagation of the code. Thus, any claim that this code is not under GPL would inherently be invalid, as any such claim would be in violation of the license which the contributor has implicitly agreed to by modifying and propagating modified code. Do you know of any case law or legal precedent that would prove my stance false? I'd seriously like to know. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
