I like the word "Liquid" representing the "L".

To stay true to the improper "MM" acronym (since multimedia is one word)...

"Liquid MoMentum Studio"  :)

Or just "Momentum".

MomentumStudio.org is available.

To take it a step futher....

liquidsoftware.org is available, so momentumstudio.org could redirect to
liquidsoftware.org/momentum.

[image: Inline image 1]

:)


-Tres

- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com


On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Bill Y. <b...@anzovin.com> wrote:

> Well if the goal were to stick with LMMS, here are a few options:
>
> Liquid Moment Mastering Studio
> Liquid Magma Music Stream
> Looping Movement Marking System
>
> LMMS Means Music Studio (Recursive Acronym like GNU or WINE)
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
> tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Agree completely with Vesa.  Logo is decided, name is... well... awaiting
>> a not of "genius" in terms of a name that is universally better than LMMS.
>>
>> It's the best comparison I have, but when GAIM was faced with a similar
>> decision, the word "Pidgin" and purple pigeon mascot were a fantastic and
>> natural fit to the project (the pressure from AOL over the name similarity
>> to their AIM service name certainly helped press the issue).
>>
>> So far there hasn't been a name that has resonated strong enough with the
>> team to sway a vote, so, from my perspective, recommendations welcome, but
>> a contest would suggest a winner, which would be better left decided as
>> unanimously as possible by the team, rather than a popularity vote.
>>
>> -Tres
>> On Feb 2, 2014 7:34 PM, "Vesa" <dii....@nbl.fi> wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/02/2014 10:55 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
>>> > So should we let Facebook users and forums users into the voting on
>>> name and
>>> > logo or not?
>>> >
>>>
>>> The logo has already been decided, the only question at this point is
>>> whether it's going to be in green or yellow.
>>>
>>> As for the name, I'm not really sure about that. Will there ever be a
>>> name suggestion that everyone will be satisfied with? I think the
>>> discussions on the name are at a stand still for now, and we don't yet
>>> even have a list of candidates that most of us would feel comfortable
>>> voting over... at least that's the impression I'm getting. I'd listen
>>> Toby's opinion on this matter though, as LMMS is sort of his
>>> brainchild....
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
>>> Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
>>> Read the Whitepaper.
>>>
>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LMMS-devel mailing list
>>> LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
>> Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
>> Read the Whitepaper.
>>
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> LMMS-devel mailing list
>> LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>>
>>
>

<<image.png>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to