Quoting Vesa <[email protected]>: > And since the new FX mixer also allows daisy-chaining FX channels > together, ie. sending a channel to one or more other channels, some of > the channels will be likely to be used as "intermediate" channels not > meant for export. Thus I think it's best to just let the user choose > which ones to export.
What is the typical use case for track/channel export? If it's mostly used for getting the project to some more advanced DAW for further processing, I think the user could get to choose between exporting: 1. the whole mix 2. All (non-muted) tracks 3. All (non-muted) FX mixer channels Options 2 and 3 let the user sort it out in the next piece of software, better to import some tracks into Ardour and then just grab one more when you notice it's missing than to have to go all the way back to LMMS and re-export. Track export could stay, at least for some time, as it's already existing code which probably could be fixed to work with sidechaining or else just accepted as imperfect. -- [email protected] softrabbit on #lmms ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
