On 1 Mar 2014 20:28, "Raine M. Ekman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Quoting Tobiasz Karon <[email protected]>:
>
>> Yes, there was a lot of tempo automation. I used only ZynAddSubFX, no
>> samples or other instruments. Yes I used export tracks.
>>
>> Well, maybe a warning, that the export tracks might not work as expected
>> and is being worked on, rather than disabling it completely. With no
tempo
>> automation it worked pretty nice, and is sometimes useful and good to
have.
>> It helped me out a few times.
>
>
> If the problem is in the tempo automation, it might be better in 0.9.
Automation has gotten quite a bit of changes lately, I believe. The results
don't look too bad from the 4 first tracks durations.
> 00:10:46.803
> 00:10:46.803
> 00:10:46.815
> 00:10:46.815
>
> OTOH, now instruments produce sound also when muted. I exported your
50-tracker at a speed of 3 minutes/track from a generic x86 build of
0.4.15, which couldn't play it live with the drums. The self-built 0.9.91
that can (almost*) play it with no dropouts is ATM taking close to 10
minutes/track on the same box. Looks to be 8-9 hours in total... will get
back to the sync thing tomorrow.
>
> *) Had to remove one resource-hungry Zyn track. Either that or compiling
with some harder optimizations.
>
Interesting results you have here. I don't know what to think. Faster
rendering means slower playback?
>
> --
> [email protected]
> softrabbit on #lmms
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool.
Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer
Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports.
Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
