On 03/15/2014 11:50 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looks good so far, thanks!
>
> 2014-03-15 18:55 GMT+01:00 Vesa <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>
> Should this be included in 1.0.0? Being a plugin, it's very
> unlikely to break anything else.
>
>
> That's not the only thing to consider. If we offer it now, it will be
> used in projects as soon as 1.0.0 is out. You would then have to be
> more careful about changes to the plugin in the future in order to not
> break 1.0.0 projects which use the Amp plugin. So basically it's your
> decision.
>
Well, seeing as it's a relatively simple plugin, I can't really see
wanting to add any kind of functionality into it that would break
backwards compatibility - it basically already is all it needs to be...
a simple native amplifier. Only possible changes to it are most likely
going to be under the hood, in the dsp code. There's some weirdness with
the sample-exactness - I'm not sure if the sample-exact-code is faulty,
or if there's a problem with the LFO-controller... but those are
probably things that can be solved after 1.0.0.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
