Good catch Israel.
More specifically, HUD works but becomes incompatible with LMMS when we
steal the menu functionality back, right?
Yes, OSX grabs the menu, and it does it properly (as good as it can at
least). Apparently the QT team cared more about OSX compatibility than
Unity... :) Can't say I blame them. Unity is probably the strongest force
driving Ubuntu users to Mint, second to Gnome 3 of course. :)
But in terms of HUD, I've never used it. I remember when Ubuntu announced
this, and it looked appealing, but I've never thought to use it.
If someone has a problem with this, they could easily remove the menu
setting manually from the shortcut and revert the old functionality,
right? I believe the pros outweigh the cons in this specific scenario. I
vote to keep the lmms.desktop change and we can probably put things back at
a later date once the underlying MDI/Unity compatibility issues are
resolved. Chrome has this same issue, right? If chrome can live without
HUD perhaps LMMS can too? :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
