I think though the comments in the code should be moved to the wiki or some sort of documentation outside of the code itself. If those that want to create instruments etc they don't want to stay going through the code to figure out what it does. I would say they would prefer to look at a wiki and get coding quickly.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:40 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30 March 2014 20:04, Vesa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > A reference implementation might make sense though? > > A simple instrument which doesn't do much - produces a sinewave, maybe? > > - which would be extensively commented, and would get shipped with LMMS > > but not built by default... > > If this sounds like a good idea, I could write it, seeing as I have some > > recent experience with instruments :) > > > This reminds me of GNU Hello, a "hello world" application that is > fully instrumented with all the faff a proper GNU project should have. > > https://www.gnu.org/software/hello/ > > Yes, a version of "hello world!" that got to version 2.9 ... > > > - d. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel > -- Jonathan Aquilina
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
