Thinking about this again I forgot we have doxygen comments. It woudl be great if we can have it generate a page that we coudl put online for people because, me case in point, wouldnt have realized we would have needed to compile the documentation seperately besides building lmms itself.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Vesa <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/30/2014 03:33 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > Hey guys I am wondering, after readying Toby's response to issue #537. > > Do we have an SDK in place for > > > > 1) creating synths etc native to lmms > > 2) porting synths easily to LMMS, like a base GUI that then is adapted > > according to the synth that one would like to add. > > > > These are just some thoughts at this point. > > No we don't. But do we really need a SDK? If I can do it, it can't be > too hard... > > Just look at the source code of some simple existing plugin, eg. > bitinvader. Then just build it up from there. > > The parts that interface with LMMS are pretty straightforward and pretty > well documented in-source. If you can write DSP code, you can certainly > write a LMMS plugin. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel > -- Jonathan Aquilina
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
