On 05/06/2014 11:52 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> I think it's down to lmms-project.org <http://lmms-project.org> and
> lmms.io <http://lmms.io>.
>
> I'd rather we do a proper vote. I assume that if our vote is isolated
> to our developers list then its our developers decision?
I don't see the point in making this into any kind of public vote.
It's not like LMMS-devel is some kind of closed society. Anyone can be a
"LMMS developer"... even if they don't do any of the actual coding, we
have plenty of people on this mailing list (and github) who help in
other ways - and they're all needed and appreciated.
Seeing as LMMS-devel is a very loose group with a low entry barrier,
it's IMO only natural that the people who care enough about LMMS to
become involved with the project would be the ones to decide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
• 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
• Requirements for releasing software faster
• Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
