I think that is what won hands down. Right now waiting to hear back from
gandi, and seeing what we woudl get as a supported project


On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Stian Jørgensrud <stian...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Very unfortunate about that - sign. It would have looked pretty without it.
>
> What happened about the voting? Wasn't lmms-project.org something?
>
>
> Tres Finocchiaro wrote
> > l-m.ms is available :)
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/domain-name-elections-tp8385p8720.html
> Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find
> out:
> &#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
> &#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
> &#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
> _______________________________________________
> LMMS-devel mailing list
> LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>



-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
&#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
&#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
&#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to