On 05/16/2014 12:34 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > I'm very glad this is being brought up. > > Option 2 reads the most beneficial whereas Option 1 reads the most > unobtrusive from a coding perspective. > > From you experience, do plugins/instruments/controls/etc which require > strict step values generally rely on the GUI for proper strict values, > or do they tend to be self-correcting? >
I think mostly the strict step values are needed for things like waveform selectors, comboboxes, lcd spinners and such, which operate on integers only. Those mostly use intmodels, or otherwise cast the values to ints, so you could say they're self-correcting in a way. There are exceptions though, like the decay knob on the effect panel, which moves in steps of 100... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
