On 05/24/2014 08:17 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > I don't really understand what you are having trouble with. Why not use the > timer as reference for sample tracks?
What timer? If you don't understand, don't worry about it. It's all technical stuff really. > I like the idea of a tempo track. I do not like the fact that it is > unremovable and just lies there. If you drag the tempo to an automation > track it could automatically change to a tempo track? No. That'd defeat the entire point of it. The point is there is only one tempo track, and only one place where tempo is automated. That's also how it's done in almost all other DAW's, and the reasons are pretty obvious - tempo is a special case, because it needs to be "known" "before" everything else, even other automations... in order to guarantee accurate tempo, it's much easier if we handle it separately as a special case, rather than just another automation. Also, this way it'll be much easier to implement tempo-based effects in the future, eg. tempo tapping, swing... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
