On 14 June 2014 13:55, Vesa <dii....@nbl.fi> wrote: > On 06/14/2014 03:42 PM, musikbear wrote:
>> Diiz is 100% correct. the LB does not have legato, so one note over another >> makes no sense. Yes notestacking is a no feature, and could definately be >> disregarded, as of legato is no option >> It will help in bugfixing? > It would help in bugfixing and development, by simplifying the code and > reducing the amount of codepaths to take in account. Another benefit is > the same reason why we disable ENV/LFO: non-functional features should > be hidden from the user to prevent confusion. Just remember that LMMS still doesn't have universal undo (and what it does behaves distinctly counterintuitively for me) - so please don't trash information when an instrument is switched to one that doesn't have a given functionality - ideally, please preserve the information, don't act on it. - d. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
