https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/1273 Do we need more fantastic songs which will blow the listeners mind? Do we need songs that make use of LMMS functions in a brilliant way? Do we need songs that have a combination of those? We need to discuss the process of adding projects to LMMS.
1. Criteria for putting songs into LMMS. Everyone who knows github clearly has an advantage the way we do it now. My point of view on this lies with unfa (github link). Through "competitions" / challenges we can set the rules, and then choose the song8s) which best show the part(s) of LMMS we wanted to show! 2. Second we need to talk about credits in LMMS. Now many projects has the name of their artist in the name, and we don't even know what kind of licence it got. With CC0 the problem will be solved, no reason to credit then. And honestly, there have been, are right now and are going to be a lot of great LMMS artists in the world, and having some of these artists name in the program just because they have made a song in LMMS seems stupid, we just agreed on not to have credits for samples for example. Tres, Umcaruje, StakeoutPunch and I had a conversation where I were convinced that special crediting for projects is just as unfair. -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Process-for-including-new-songs-in-LMMS-tp10726.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
