On 10/31/2014 06:44 AM, Vesa wrote: > So, we're pretty much ready to release 1.1, but... > > Ok, so I don't really like to rip on other people's code, there's > definitely problems with some of my own code as well so can't really > point fingers... however, lately, I've been thinking that the current > implementation of logarithmic models is flawed.
Ok I looked at this today and it seems that the issue is a bit trickier. I don't think we can fix it without some serious changes to how automations work, which I'm not sure if we should even make. I remembered wrong about knobs, seems that knobs already handle logscales just like they should. But with automations, well... there's the problem of interpolation, ie. if we linear-interpolate on the raw values, then the curve won't be linear in the logarithmic scale... so the only option is for the values be interpolated and then convert to logarithmic, like we're doing now. It's not pretty but it works, so we should probably leave it alone for now. Backwards compat will suffer but oh well. At least we have logscale knobs (which aren't really actually even logscale, just a sort of approximation, because real logscale wouldn't work with zero or negative values). So no need to hold back 1.1 for this I guess. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
