>
> > They have certain tasks which they like to call easy hacks. They
> classify them according to difficulty and how much programming know how one
> needs.
I think if you've been following the discussion on our bug tracker and our
mailing list you will notice we have many of these easy hacks and as of
recently, we have people finding them and closing them out.
I'm not sure how much easier you want it. Categorizing on expertise is
more work for the repository maintainers (which you currently are BTW), so
what you are suggesting should be done by someone like you anyway. Get to
it! :)
But seriously speaking, we are actively doing this now. If you want a bug
to start on, just explain what you want to help with and we'll link you a
few.
I would really like to see some more of the Apple bugs ironed out, which
only a few community members have the resources to test and debug here:
https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/search?q=Apple&state=open&type=Issues
Of if you'd rather fix some of the smaller nuances with the software for
our 1.1 release:
https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A1.1.0
Or perhaps investigate some GUI bugs:
https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/search?p=2&q=gui&state=open&type=Issues
But you know this already. :)
-Tres
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:49 AM, musikbear <mkru...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Jonathan Aquilina wrote
> > Do you guys think this would be a good thing to have and maybe list them
> > on
> > the website?
>
> I think it would be a tremendious idea! -But theres is a crevat. It would
> mean that some really strong develloper went through all the tickets, and
> marked the tickets in difficulti-classes
> ==HUGE WORK!
>
> In this context, i thought off think about the engine, as if it has three
> 'levels'
> Critical, Serious & indulgent
> where
> Critical is core.
> Serious is the parts, that directly would influence core -especially
> through
> automation
> indulgent the *parts of the UI*, that is /not automatable/, and where
> effeciency /does not impact /on playing functionality.
> I feel that 'we' happy amateurs :) should /stay away from Critical/ and
> only
> touch Serious where clean models exists (read /study & copy).That mean,
> stay
> in the indulgent category -And there is plenty there -i think..?
> Now - Hate me :p
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Lowering-the-barrier-of-entry-for-would-be-developers-tp10886p10901.html
> Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
> from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
> with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
> Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> LMMS-devel mailing list
> LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
