Tres Finocchiaro wrote > Oh... So the developer raises the money himself?
I think we need to settle on that option, as I recall that would be the best option to avoid thinking about taxes and bureaucracy. So the money would go directly to the selected developer. Thinking about what happens with the money if the goal isn't reached, I suggest having backup goals, smaller goals so that if the community for example raise 200 dollars and the goal is X dollars (a lot more probably?) there won't be a lot of money laying around. -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Paid-Dev-Fundraising-Pitivi-Style-tp11378p11398.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
